featured

Industry experts debate positives, drawbacks of net metering

While some have called net metering – allowing consumers who generate their own electricity to use that electricity at any time, not just when it is generated – a relic of a previous energy era, Dr. Charles Cicchetti of the Pacific Economics Group contends that distributed energy resources (DER) are a net benefit for the overall energy sector and rate-paying customers.

DER systems are decentralized, flexible technologies, including solar and wind power, that, through net metering, allow consumers to use solar power generated during the day at night or wind from a windy day later during the month.

Cicchetti, speaking at a debate with Ashley C. Brown of Harvard University’s Electricity Policy Group at the annual summer meeting of the National Association of Utility Commissioners (NARUC), said that the benefits of net metering are numerous.

“The first of these benefits come in the form reduced capacity in transmission distribution and generation,” Cicchetti said. “There are also important societal benefits in the form of reduced air pollution and air quality control.”

Brown, however, countered that such benefits are offset by net metering customers paying retail prices for a wholesale product, which, in turn, increases prices for solar installation. The premium price paid for what Brown called less efficient products misallocates capital for carbon reduction.

More importantly, Cicchetti said, net metering relieves stress on the electric grid.

“What’s also really important is that customers who used to use the grid during peak usage times are now not doing so,” Cicchetti said. “Why should they have to pay much more for that grid?

Brown said that, going forward, best practices would be to provide market-based pricing. In the absence of market-based pricing, he said, cost-based regulation should be the preferred choice to make.

Net energy metering is not a subsidy for rooftop solar, Cicchetti said, because solar customers pay to install the systems themselves.

Cicchetti added that regulators should work to achieve grid neutrality by clarifying the value that DER and private storage bring to the grid and society. This practice, he said, would not allow utilities to give preferential treatment to utility-owned systems without offering opportunities for private system owners to become more integrated.

“Open and transparent grid access should be a public policy goal that regulators encourage,” Cicchetti said.

Alex Murtha

Recent Posts

National Renewable Energy Lab uses robots to aid wind turbine blade manufacturing

Looking to cut down on the difficult nature of the work for humans and improve consistency of the outcome, the…

20 hours ago

Switch to LED streetlights could save Sylvania, Ohio nearly $77,000 annually

Toledo Edison this month began a massive streetlight conversion project through Sylvania, Ohio, installing the first of 1,650 LED replacements.…

20 hours ago

Southern Nuclear names new CEO and chairman

Peter Sena III has been named the new chairman and CEO of Southern Nuclear, a subsidiary of the Southern Company.…

20 hours ago

Argonne National Lab to build R&D facility to test large-scale fuel cell systems

The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is con structing a research and development (R&D) facility to…

20 hours ago

Program that offers tax credits for wind and solar in low-income communities to launch soon

A program that provides a 10 or 20-percentage point boost to the investment tax credit for qualified solar or wind…

2 days ago

Business Council for Sustainable Energy voices support for crackdown on critical mineral supply chains

As the House considers numerous ways to lock China out of the U.S. market, the Business Council for Sustainable Energy…

2 days ago

This website uses cookies.