News

Trump Administration sends nuclear cooperation agreements with UK, Mexico to Congress

The White House recently sent new bilateral nuclear cooperation agreements to facilitate commercial nuclear cooperation, also called Section 123 agreements, with the United Kingdom (U.K.) and Mexico to Congress for review.

Due to U.K.’s exit from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) in 2016, a new bilateral agreement is needed to continue U.S. cooperation with the U.K. nuclear energy sector.

“Because the United Kingdom has announced significant plans to develop new nuclear plants in the years ahead, including possibly small modular reactors, this Section 123 agreement is critical for U.S. nuclear exports and American jobs,” Dan Lipman, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) vice president of Suppliers, New Reactors and International Programs, said.

The U.K. is currently building four large reactors and has expressed interest in small modular reactors (SMRs).

“We commend the Trump Administration for submitting to Congress for review a 123 Agreement with the United Kingdom, which facilitates trade in nuclear technology between our countries,” Lipman said. “The U.K. government’s decision to invest in new nuclear power generation is based on a recognition that nuclear energy is a clean, reliable and emissions-free energy source that reduces the nation’s reliance on imported fossil fuels.”

The agreement between the United States and Mexico will replace a multilateral agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in supporting U.S.-Mexico cooperation. It will reestablish Mexico’s eligibility for general authorization under 10 CFR Part 810, the regulation which governs U.S. nuclear technology exports.

Mexico’s 2015 National Electric System Development Program included plans to commission new reactors. Under the plan’s tentative schedule, they would begin commercial operation by the mid-2020s.

“Affirming our close collaboration with Mexico means our trade in nuclear energy goods and services will continue, supporting jobs and local economies across America,” Lipman said. “This agreement also positions U.S. nuclear companies to compete for significant new opportunities in Mexico, including possibly a multibillion-dollar reactor deal.”

Congress now has 90 days of continuous session to review the two agreements.

Kevin Randolph

Recent Posts

South Carolina legislation will help Duke Energy Progress customers save money

Innovative legislation will help Duke Energy Progress customers in South Carolina save $35 million in repair costs from a series…

10 hours ago

Appalachian Power, Wheeling Power file cost recovery submissions for West Virginia

Looking to recover costs associated with increased fuel and vegetation management expenditures, Appalachian Power and Wheeling Power recently submitted new…

10 hours ago

Hawaiian Electric launches online siting tool for electric vehicle charging stations

As a way to aid the deployment of electric vehicle charging stations, Hawaiian Electric this week released the online Electric…

10 hours ago

AEP issues 2024 corporate sustainability report

American Electric Power (AEP) released its 2024 Corporate Sustainability Report, which documents its sustainable business practices, strategy, performance and impact.…

10 hours ago

Louisville Gas and Electric and Kentucky Utilities issue RFP for solar, wind and hydro

Louisville Gas and Electric Company (LG&E) and Kentucky Utilities (KU) issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for new solar, wind,…

1 day ago

Southern Power brings Wyoming’s first solar facility online

Wyoming gained its first solar facility this week, and Southern Power its 30th, with the beginning of operations at the…

1 day ago

This website uses cookies.