News

New York State PSC approves up to $6B for Champlain Hudson transmission line

A 339-mile direct current transmission line running from Canada to New York gained a green light from the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) last week to acquire up to $6 billion in private financing and to utilize the rights granted it under previous municipal approvals.

The Champlain Hudson Power Express Project is a high voltage project under development by CHPE LLC and CHPE Properties, Inc. Previously, those involved were authorized to borrow up to $4.5 billion for the project, but recently sought permission to reach the new, $6 billion limit. This will not affect ratepayers, only the developers, according to the PSC. Helping the situation is the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), which will purchase renewable energy credits for power delivered through the line – but increased authorized indebtedness will not alter prices established by the NYSERDA contract, either.

“By encouraging the development of environmentally acceptable projects that reinforce the backbone of our energy system, New York is helping ensure a clean energy future,” Commission Chair Rory Christian said. “In addition to ensuring the safety and reliability of the transmission system, the Champlain Hudson project, and others being developed, will play a key role in our comprehensive plan to modernize our state’s transmission system so that it delivers clean energy to all New Yorkers, while advancing our climate goals and creating clean-energy jobs.”

The PSC first authorized the Champlain Hudson developers to proceed in 2013, after determining that the project would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity, while reducing any adverse environmental impacts. Even now, numerous groups have come out in support of the revised permissions granted to the project to keep it going, including local municipalities and school districts, who cited the potential long-term financial benefits and cooperative nature of the developers.

While the Commission has concluded that environmental concerns have been addressed for the project, some other groups have opposed the project as a whole as potentially damaging to the Hudson River and under-beneficial for those involved.

Chris Galford

Recent Posts

South Carolina legislation will help Duke Energy Progress customers save money

Innovative legislation will help Duke Energy Progress customers in South Carolina save $35 million in repair costs from a series…

11 hours ago

Appalachian Power, Wheeling Power file cost recovery submissions for West Virginia

Looking to recover costs associated with increased fuel and vegetation management expenditures, Appalachian Power and Wheeling Power recently submitted new…

11 hours ago

Hawaiian Electric launches online siting tool for electric vehicle charging stations

As a way to aid the deployment of electric vehicle charging stations, Hawaiian Electric this week released the online Electric…

11 hours ago

AEP issues 2024 corporate sustainability report

American Electric Power (AEP) released its 2024 Corporate Sustainability Report, which documents its sustainable business practices, strategy, performance and impact.…

11 hours ago

Louisville Gas and Electric and Kentucky Utilities issue RFP for solar, wind and hydro

Louisville Gas and Electric Company (LG&E) and Kentucky Utilities (KU) issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for new solar, wind,…

1 day ago

Southern Power brings Wyoming’s first solar facility online

Wyoming gained its first solar facility this week, and Southern Power its 30th, with the beginning of operations at the…

1 day ago

This website uses cookies.