News

Michigan Nuclear Feasibility Study finds source could help clean energy transition, but with major caveats

Although the United States has gone hot and cold with nuclear power over the years, a new Nuclear Feasibility Study presented to the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) this week touted its potential capabilities for the clean energy transition, but with significant concerns.

Costs, environmental concerns and public worries remain surrounding nuclear, even if it could help Michigan achieve its goal of 100 percent clean energy generation by 2040. Enercon Services East, PC – an outside consulting firm tapped to study the feasibility of nuclear power in Michigan – found that new plans come with high upfront capital costs, long project development timelines due to regulatory obligations and more, as well as lingering public concerns about the danger of such plants.

Further, the green image of these plants hasn’t been helped by the fact that there remains to this day no national consensus on how to permanently dispose of spent nuclear waste.

It wasn’t all bad, though. The report found that nuclear plants require relatively small amounts of land for the significant amount of reliable energy they can provide. That energy also comes emissions-free. Currently, three nuclear units operate at two Michigan power plants, with a third seeking regulatory approval under Holtec International to reinstate its operating license and procure federal funding to restart.

In a hypothetical scenario proposed by the report, a new nuclear power plant also brought in an estimated $3.6 billion to $3.7 billion in economic benefits for its area, along with hundreds of long term jobs, while reducing CO2 emissions by approximately 365,000 tons of CO2 per year, as well as other gasses. Even when considering the upfront costs, the report noted that costs could potentially be recouped through long-term economic impacts and increased taxes – although the latter would likely be unpopular.

The report was ordered by the Michigan Legislature, and by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Chris Galford

Recent Posts

Analysts update report on Order 1000’s impact on project costs ahead of FERC’s transmission order

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) long-awaited transmission planning and cost-allocation proposal is being considered on May 13 in a…

2 days ago

DOE issues final rule on transmission permitting

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a final rule on transmission permitting and announced a commitment for up to…

3 days ago

Con Edison updates clean energy progress in annual sustainability report

Con Edison released its annual sustainability report, in which it outlines its progress in developing the energy infrastructure to support…

3 days ago

Joint NASEO, NARUC report suggests nuclear options amid coal closures

As the U.S. energy industry moves further from coal as a resource, many options have arisen as replacements, but a…

3 days ago

Duke Energy reports carbon emissions down 48 percent since 2005

According to Duke Energy’s 2023 Impact Report, electric generation carbon emissions are down 48 percent since 2005 and the company…

3 days ago

EPA announces clean heavy-duty vehicle transition grants

On Wednesday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced it would provide nearly $1 billion in grants for zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles,…

3 days ago

This website uses cookies.