Michigan study finds alternatives to Line 5 pipeline not feasible
A recently released study by the state of Michigan found that several previously discussed alternatives to continuing operation of the Line 5 pipeline, which is owned by Enbridge and runs through the Straits of Mackinac, would not be feasible.
The report, conducted by pipeline risk management consultants Dynamic Risk, examined alternatives such
as using other, existing oil pipelines, tanker trucks or oil barges, which it found not be workable. Shipping
oil by train and constructing new pipelines were found to be more feasible but would also require high costs.
“Today’s report further confirms that pipelines are among the safest and most efficient ways to transport crude oil,” API Michigan Executive Director Peter Langley said. “Alternative transportation methods to Michigan’s Line 5 pipeline were evaluated and ultimately eliminated due to a greater potential for environmental incidents and higher energy costs for Michigan consumers.
The report concluded that current pipeline could operate indefinitely. Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, however, called for a ban on transporting heavy crude and tar sand oil through the Line 5 pipeline. Schuette called a new pipe a “viable option.”
In June, Michigan officials cancelled a second study on the risks of a worst-case scenario oil spill on the Straits section of Line 5 after discovering than an employee who worked on the study also did work for Enbridge, violating conflict of interest provisions in the study’s contract.
