News

Representatives urge FERC to continue critical natural gas, LNG projects during COVID-19 crisis

Calling for a moratorium on natural gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects during the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. Reps. Vicente Gonzales (D-TX), Bill Flores (R-TX), Bill Johnson (R-OH), Jim Costa (D-CA), and Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX) recently forwarded correspondence to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) with a plea to continue business as normal.

The letter, addressed to FERC Chairman Neil Chatterjee, called for an outright rejection of a moratorium on approving and constructing new projects during the COVID-19 pandemic, labeling such measures essential to energy security. The representatives also noted the role that FERC itself in ensuring that people throughout the country have access to affordable and reliable energy.

“Even in uncertain times, we know that American prosperity and energy security are intrinsically linked, and that is why the energy sector is critical to our current response and will be a key component of our recovery,” the lawmakers wrote. “To this end, the maintenance and development of critical energy infrastructure – such as natural gas pipelines and liquified natural gas (LNG) export facilities – is vital to the nation’s safety, prosperity, and well-being.”

Construction on previously approved projects should be able to continue, so long as they abide by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state guidelines, the members argued. To do any less would create significant job losses. Likewise, to close public engagement — something they labeled critical to FERC actions — would threaten the U.S. ability to produce and deliver essential fuels. And while the crisis might cause short-term dampening of demand, the members cited the long-term outlook for domestic natural gas utilization — gas consumption makes up around one-third of American energy consumption, with shares expected to rise — as a reason to keep business moving.

“We agree that public engagement in FERC proceedings remains a critical component in the infrastructure approval process, but a moratorium is both unnecessary and detrimental to the nation’s energy security,” the members wrote. “During this period, FERC should move forward, as health and safety constraints may allow, with all applications for review of natural gas intrastate pipelines and LNG facilities, while embracing new forms of public engagement.”

Gonzalez is the chair of the House Oil and Gas Caucus, while Fletcher, Flores, Johnson, and Costa are co-chairs of the Natural Gas Caucus.

Chris Galford

Recent Posts

Central Maine Power surpasses state 2023 service performance standards

Central Maine Power Co. (CMP) has exceeded performance standards set by the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC), according to its…

1 day ago

PSEG Long Island honored with award for digital engagement

PSEG Long Island received an award recently for innovation in digital engagement. The CS Week Expanding Excellence Award for Innovation…

2 days ago

Florida Power & Light to cut fuel charges, reducing overall rates

For the second month running, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) will reduce customer rates, thanks to approved cuts to…

2 days ago

New study from National Grid probes energy planning, non-pipeline alternatives

A new study by National Grid and RMI seeks to better understand how integrated energy planning (IEP) and non-pipeline alternatives…

2 days ago

PJM predicts adequate resources to meet hotter, wetter summer demand

Valley Forge, Pa.-based PJM Interconnection said Thursday it anticipates having enough resources to meet electricity demand for what weather forecasters…

2 days ago

U.S. Department of Energy selects Mon Power for potential reward of $5M reliability project grant

Mon Energy of West Virginia will begin award negotiations with the United States Department of Energy (DOE) in coming days…

2 days ago

This website uses cookies.